Earlham vs UW-La Crosse: Softball Program Comparison
Two D3 programs. UW-La Crosse runs $38,382 less per year out of state; UW-La Crosse graduates 3 points more of its students.
Which one is right for you?
Neither school is better in the abstract — they are better for different athletes. These are the differences big enough to actually decide on.
Lean Earlham if…
- On the figures we hold, Earlham does not lead UW-La Crosse on any measure above. If you are choosing between them, the deciding factors are the ones no table holds: how the staff talks to you, where you would sit on the depth chart, and whether you would want to be there without softball.
Lean UW-La Crosse if…
- You are an out-of-state recruit and the number on the bill matters: UW-La Crosse lists $38,382 less per year in tuition and housing than Earlham.
- You would be in-state: UW-La Crosse is $42,189 cheaper per year on published in-state tuition than Earlham.
- Finishing the degree is the priority: UW-La Crosse graduates 3 percentage points more of its students than Earlham.
What it costs to go there
Published sticker price from IPEDS. Almost nobody pays it — athletic, academic and need-based aid all come off the top — but the gap between two schools is a fair read on the gap between two offers.
| Measure | Earlham | UW-La Crosse |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition & fees | $51,840 | $9,651 — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: lower published in-state tuition |
| Out-of-state tuition & fees | $51,840 | $18,691 — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: lower published out-of-state tuition |
| Room & board | $13,193 | $7,960 — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: lower room & board |
| Est. in-state year, all inTuition & fees plus room & board. Excludes books, travel and any aid. | $65,033 | $17,611 — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: lower total in-state cost |
| Est. out-of-state year, all inTuition & fees plus room & board. Excludes books, travel and any aid. | $65,033 | $26,651 — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: lower total out-of-state cost |
What you leave with
Federal College Scorecard figures for all students at the institution, not softball players specifically. Read them as a signal about the degree, not about the program.
| Measure | Earlham | UW-La Crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 68% | 71% — UW-La Crosse leads on this measure: higher share of students finishing their degree |
| Median earnings, 10 years after entry | $50,797/yr | — |
| Median debt at graduation | $23,488 | — |
| Debt as a share of year-10 payMedian debt divided by median earnings 10 years after entry. Lower is easier to pay back. | 46% | — |
Getting in, and what you'd walk into
Admissions and size. A coach can support your file, but at most schools they cannot admit you — the academic profile below is the bar you still have to clear.
| Measure | Earlham | UW-La Crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Admission rateLower means more selective — harder to get in, but not automatically the better fit. | 73% | — |
| Total enrollmentNeither is better — it is the difference between a lecture hall and a seminar table. | 696 | 10,299 |
| Where it is | Richmond, IN | La Crosse, WI |
The softball program itself
Division and conference set the ceiling; the postseason record and staff tell you what the program has actually done with it.
| Measure | Earlham | UW-La Crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Conference | HCAC | WIAC |
| Head coach | Stacey Goyette | Sam Korn |
How you actually get in front of them
Camps and questionnaires are the two channels a recruit controls. Where a program runs its own camp, that camp is usually the shortest path to being evaluated by the staff that would recruit you.
| Measure | Earlham | UW-La Crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Camps we track | 1 listed | 1 listed (1 with dates) |
| Recruiting questionnaire | Yes | — |
| Program on X / Instagram | Yes | — |
Scholarship money, honestly
Both programs sit at NCAA Division III, so the scholarship rules are identical: 0 (no athletic scholarships). There are no athletic scholarships at D3 — by rule. But D3 schools often award generous academic merit and need-based aid that can rival an athletic scholarship elsewhere.
What to do about it this week
Questionnaires are exempt from NCAA contact-date rules, so you can submit one at any age. A program's own camp is where its staff does most of its evaluating — submit the questionnaire first so they know to look for you.
UW-La Crosse
Find the recruiting questionnaireWe do not hold a verified form link for this program — this opens a search.
Camps we track
- Softball Prospect Camp | August 12th08/12/2026 · 9th Grade - 12th Grade · $140
Earlham vs UW-La Crosse: common questions
- Is Earlham or UW-La Crosse cheaper?
- On published price, UW-La Crosse is cheaper — about $26,651 a year out of state in tuition and housing, against $65,033 at Earlham. That is sticker price; athletic, academic and need-based aid all come off it, so ask both coaches what an actual offer would look like.
- Which school graduates more of its students, Earlham or UW-La Crosse?
- UW-La Crosse, at 71% against 68% at Earlham (IPEDS, 2023-24). That is the whole student body, not the softball roster.
- Do Earlham and UW-La Crosse offer softball scholarships?
- Both play at NCAA Division III: 0 (no athletic scholarships). There are no athletic scholarships at D3 — by rule. But D3 schools often award generous academic merit and need-based aid that can rival an athletic scholarship elsewhere.
- Do Earlham and UW-La Crosse run softball camps?
- Both do — we track 1 at Earlham and 1 at UW-La Crosse. A program's own camp is usually the fastest way to be evaluated by the staff that would recruit you.
- How do I contact the coaches at Earlham and UW-La Crosse?
- Earlham runs a recruiting questionnaire — submit it first, since questionnaires are exempt from NCAA contact-date rules. For UW-La Crosse, we do not hold a verified form link, so start from the program page and email the staff directly.
Cost, graduation and enrollment figures from IPEDS (U.S. Dept. of Education, 2023-24). Earnings, debt and admission rates from the federal College Scorecard. Postseason results from the NCAA Division I softball tournament records, 2021-2026. Rankings from NCAA.com and U.S. News & World Report. Figures describe the institution, not the softball roster.
We work hard to keep all data for Earlham and UW-La Crosse accurate and up-to-date, but we sometimes miss changes or get something wrong.
Still deciding between them?
Track both programs, log every coach you contact, and see where you actually stand against each one's recruiting profile.
Start free